Why Gold Is Holding Despite Fed Rate Hikes
The Federal Reserve delivered its most hawkish remarks in months, a development that in theory should pressure gold. Yet gold is down less than 1% and silver is holding roughly flat. The market that is supposed to fear a September rate hike doesn’t appear convinced one is coming.
Gold trades near $4,440 per ounce today, a modest dip from Friday’s close. Silver sits around $67 on a choppy session. Two forces are colliding: a new U.S. military strike in the Strait of Hormuz and a Federal Reserve rate-hike narrative that is far less settled than many headlines implied.
What Happened Overnight in the Strait of Hormuz?
U.S. forces struck two Iranian rocket launchers on Larak Island on August 30 after the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps reportedly prepared rockets carrying sea mines for the Strait of Hormuz. U.S. Central Command called it the first direct strike on Iranian positions in weeks. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards acknowledged the strike and said they retaliated overnight, striking bases linked to the U.S. in Jordan and the UAE and claiming to have downed a U.S. drone over the strait. Oil rose on the news: West Texas Intermediate crude climbed roughly 1.3% to 2% as the strait normally carries about a fifth of the world’s seaborne oil.
The Edge Every Investor Needs
Smarter precious metals investing starts here. The Nuggets Newsletter brings essential market insights, Fed updates, global trends, educational videos, and more.
Why Isn’t Gold Rallying on a Fresh Middle East Strike?
A geopolitical shock like this normally draws buyers to gold as a store of value. But at the moment a stronger force is pulling in the opposite direction: rising odds of a Federal Reserve rate hike. A rate increase raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like gold. When two forces point opposite ways, prices show which factor is dominating today, not necessarily which will be more important over the long run. Today, the Fed-odds story is winning.
That narrative began with Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s Jackson Hole remarks last Friday. Warsh described inflation as “more concerning” than the labor market and highlighted the headline Personal Consumption Expenditures measure at 3.7% versus the Fed’s 2% target. Markets interpreted Warsh’s speech as hawkish. But how hawkish is the key question, and much of the coverage overstated the market’s certainty.

How Confident Is the Market That the Fed Will Actually Hike?
Less confident than many headlines suggest. The CME FedWatch tool, which converts fed funds futures into implied probabilities, shows roughly a 57% to 58% chance of a 25-basis-point September hike—up sharply from about 40% before Warsh’s speech. That’s a meaningful jump, but it’s far short of the 90%+ level that markets typically treat as a near-certainty.
Prediction markets paint a more skeptical picture. Polymarket prices the same hike at about 48% to 49%, while Kalshi shows nearly identical odds split roughly 52% for hold versus 48% for a hike. Three venues, three perspectives: none describe a market that has fully made up its mind.
Market commentators have been blunt. Jim Bianco of Bianco Research called the next Fed meeting “a lean hike, not a done deal.” Other investment managers have echoed the view that the odds are mixed and that the Fed’s trajectory remains uncertain across venues and time horizons.
If a Hike Happens, Would It Even Be Bad for Gold?
Some economists disagree with the simple narrative that a hike would crush gold prices. Robin Brooks, a senior fellow and former chief economist at the Institute of International Finance, argues that a hike could mostly serve to anchor the 10-year Treasury yield and restore perceived Fed credibility without meaningfully tightening financial conditions. In his view, recent bond market moves were the real trigger for shifting expectations, and a September move could be performative—designed to look tough even as the Fed keeps conditions relatively loose.
That distinction matters: meaningful tightening that cools demand is different from a credibility move that merely re-anchors yields. If the latter occurs, the underlying dynamic—persistent inflation above target coupled with a Fed managing optics as much as substance—remains. That environment is precisely the one many sound-money investors have been preparing for, regardless of the outcome of a single meeting.
What Does This Mean for Gold and Silver Investors?
The deeper story driving precious metals this week isn’t the Hormuz strike alone, and it isn’t any single speech. Warsh’s remarks were one of several signals moving gold and silver. More important is the persistent uncertainty about what a September rate decision would actually signify for monetary policy and market conditions.
If a hike is priced as a credibility move rather than real tightening, the long-term pressures that support precious metals—inflation above target and financial conditions that may still be loose—remain intact. That makes the current environment favorable for investors who view gold and silver as hedges against persistent inflation and policy ambiguity.
Two near-term events to watch: the August jobs report (released Friday, September 4) and the Federal Open Market Committee meeting on September 16. The jobs data could materially shift rate expectations before the FOMC convenes. Equally important will be the Fed’s language if it does hike: wording that emphasizes anchoring yields and credibility reads very differently from wording that signals a genuine effort to cool demand, even if the headline rate action is identical.
SOURCES
1. CoinDesk — “Bitcoin and gold may have room to surge further as September Fed rate-hike fears look overblown,” August 31, 2026.
2. CoinDesk — “Bitcoin barely blinks, XRP drops as U.S. strikes Iran and oil rallies,” August 31, 2026.
3. Associated Press via NBC News — “U.S. forces strike Iranian rocket launchers on the Strait of Hormuz in first military action in weeks,” August 30, 2026.
4. CNBC — “September Fed decision is now a coin flip as rate hike odds increase post Warsh,” August 28, 2026.
5. Bitcoin.com News — “Fedwatch Turns Hawkish With 57% Odds of September Rate Increase,” August 30, 2026.
6. Robin Brooks (Brookings Institution) — “Will a September hike hurt gold?”
7. CME Group — FedWatch Tool, September 2026 FOMC meeting probabilities.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.
You May Also Like:
- Gold and Silver Sink as Warsh Cites AI Boom to Justify More Fed Tightening
- Five Things Moved Gold and Silver This Week. Only One Was Kevin Warsh.
- The Treasury’s Next Move Isn’t a Rate Cut. It’s a $967 Billion Checking Account.
- Six Paper Claims, One Ounce of Silver: What First Notice Day Reveals
- Five Gold Signals Fired This Week. None of Them Are About Today’s Price.
- Gold Fell 9% the Last Time Warsh Spoke. He’s Back Tomorrow.
- Gold Ran Past Wall Street’s Own Price Targets. Four Banks Disagree on What Happens Next.
Popular Topics
Picked from the archive
-
01
Topics
Fed’s September Shift: Impact on Gold Prices
-
02
Topics
5 Catalysts That Moved Gold and Silver This Week
-
03
Topics
Gold Price Tops $5,200, Silver $90 as Inflation Persists
-
04
Topics
Sound Money: Why the Dollar Has Lost 87% Since 1971
-
05
Topics
Gold Price Volatility Back to COVID-Era Levels
-
06
Topics
Gold Jumps 1% – Why July CPI Matters More Than the Headline
-
07
Topics
Why Gold Holds Value: The 5,000-Year Truth Investors Miss
-
08
Topics
Fed Decision Looms: Gold Poised for 8:30 AM Reaction








